Mumia At The Crossroads in the Age of Obama April 03, 2010
MUMIA ABU-JAMAL is an African-American writer and journalist who has spent the last 24 years on Pennsylvania’s death row. His demand for justice and a new trial is supported by heads of state from France to South Africa, by Nobel Laureates, the European Parliament, city governments from Detroit to San Francisco to Paris, France, scholars, religious leaders, artists, scientists, the Congressional Black Caucus and other members of U.S. Congress, and by countless thousands who cherish democratic and human rights the world over.
 
Since the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001, Jamal’s journalistic skills, historical analysis and eloquent pen have only confirmed his reputation as “voice of the voiceless.” With judicious historical insight and pointed probing of the issues, he continues to question and enlighten his readers through scores of columns, illuminating such issues as U.S. empire, terrorism, poverty, the U.S. support of Pakistan during the war in Afghanistan, the U.S. war and occupation of Iraq, and so much more. (See the “Mumia Index” on this site.) His columns and essays continue to find place in scholarly books as well as in the street newspapers of the homeless.
 
Working people have expressed their support for Jamal through their leading regional, national and international trade union bodies. The International Longshore and Warehouse Union closed down West coast ports for the day of April 24, 1999, to support Mumia’s bid for a new trial.
 
Jamal’s books and over 500 published columns have been adopted as resource material for the teaching and inspiration of a growing number of students, youth, and educators who have come to see their futures as intimately tied to the outcome of this case. The 1982 trial that convicted Jamal of killing Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner has been challenged by leading legal analysts and scholars, from Stuart Taylor writing in the prestigious American Lawyer magazine, to Per Walsoe of the Supreme Court of Denmark, to Amnesty International which issued a special report in February 2000, claiming that “justice would best be served by the granting of a new trial…” to Jamal.
 
While Jamal has worked while confined as an advocate for so many others, he has maintained his own innocence from the beginning, and does so in ever clearer and more emphatic tones to the present day. His attorneys have presented compelling evidence that key witnesses were intimidated or coerced to provide false testimony, that a purported “confession” by Mumia was likely fabricated by police, and that vital evidence pointing to his innocence was withheld from the defense. A key eyewitness has now recanted critical court testimony she gave under police intimidation and which was used against Jamal.
 
The confused and flagrantly-biased character of the prosecutors’ case against Mumia has only mushroomed over the years: yet another affidavit has been offered that casts doubt on the original witnesses’ claims that Mumia had confessed to the murder; another man now has even stepped forward to claim that he is the one who killed the officer Mumia was convicted of killing; and a court stenographer swears in another affidavit that she heard Mumia’s original judge, Albert Sabo, say during a court recess, “Yeah, and I’m gonna help ’em fry the nigger.” (Up to the time of his death just a few years ago, Judge Sabo maintained he had been racially unbiased throughout Mumia’s trial.)
 
Jamal was forced to appeal his conviction before this same judge who had sentenced him to death in 1982. Judge Sabo was notorious for presiding over capital cases resulting in 33 people being sentenced to death (all but two, people of color), more than twice the number of any sitting judge in the United States.
 
So confused and biased is the case against Mumia that a U.S. District Judge finally had to acknowledge just one of the problems of Mumia’s conviction, and in 1999 he thus vacated the death sentence against Mumia. The prosecution, however, with the help of police unions like the Fraternal Order of Police, are still working tirelessly and vigorously to see that he is executed. Mumia remains on death row while the prosecution appeals the suspension of a death sentence. Meanwhile, Mumia’s attorneys press on to gain an overturning of the judgment of guilt against Mumia toward the end of achieving his freedom. His life still hangs in the balance, with death just a few callous and cruel decisions away.
 
WE EDUCATORS ARE UNITED IN SAYING NO TO JAMAL’S EXECUTION. We invite you to study this web site, explore the case and the issues – for Mumia’s sake and that of so many others on U.S. death row.
 
■ Jamal has long been a POLITICAL TARGET as a prominent journalist critic of police brutality and racism in Philadelphia since the days of Mayor Frank Rizzo.
 
■ Jamal is made more vulnerable by sweeping JUDGMENTS AGAINST DISSENTERS as “terrorists,” and he has become less protected today, as many progressive activists in post-9/11 USA turn more of their attention and energy toward the war in Iraq, tensions in the Middle East and general surveillance issues in the U.S.
 
■ Jamal’s life is increasingly put at risk because even in post-9/11 USA he remains a vigorous critic of POLICE REPRESSION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE. Whether writing about the outrage of torture at the Guantánamo Base detention center, or in the jails and lockups of Brooklyn, New York, and Austin, Texas, Mumia’s as “voice for the voiceless” puts him at ever greater risk.
 
■ Jamal has challenged the present political priorities of SPENDING MORE FOR WAR AND PRISONS THAN FOR EDUCATION. The youth who increasingly rally to Mumia’s cause in the name of justice and fair play know that we build jailhouse cell blocks more rapidly than schoolhouse classrooms.
 
AS EDUCATORS, IN PENNSYLVANIA, ACROSS THE UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD, WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE EXECUTION OF MUMIA ABU-JAMAL. While there are those who believe Mumia is innocent and should be FREED NOW, and others who have no opinion about his innocence, we are all united in viewing Mumia’s 1982 trial as a travesty of justice, and affirm that he MUST have a NEW TRIAL!

Last Update: Jun 15, 2009
HANS BENNETT REVIEWS TODAY SHOW OF DEC. 6, 2007

NBC's Today Show Spotlights New Mumia Abu-Jamal Crime Scene Photos 
by Hans Bennett, Abu-Jamal-News.com

--View the show's overview and video online.

"There are some photographs that have been released by supporters of Mumia, and they were taken by a freelancer named Pedro Polakoff. The supporters say that these photos show a policeman holding two guns in his bare hand, contradicting the officer's trial testimony that he had preserved ballistics evidence. Another shows your husband's hat on top of a car, and not on the sidewalk as it is in the official police photo of the crime scene. A third shows a blood-stained sidewalk where the shooting took place, but does not show any signs of the marks in the concrete that might have occurred if your husband had been shot from above as prosecutors contended. The defense attorney says that he can 'have a field day' with these photographs if a new trial..." --Matt Lauer, Today Show co-host.

Today's December 6 broadcast of NBC's Today Show, the highest rated morning news show in the country, featured the newly discovered Mumia Abu-Jamal / Daniel Faulkner crime scene photos taken by press photographer Pedro P. Polakoff. The photos had been completely ignored by the mainstream media (only published by The SF Bay View), until a Dec. 4 Reuters article reported on a press conference in Philadelphia where the photos were presented by several prominent journalists, along with other evidence of both an unfair trial and innocence, as was also reported by The Black Commentator.

The photos were presented on the Today Show segment featuring Michael Smerconish and Maureen Faulkner, marking the release of their new book titled "Murdered by Mumia." The show followed a massive media-activist campaign that was launched weeks before by supporters of Abu-Jamal to "ensure fairness" on the Dec. 6 program. A large group of Mumia supporters gathered outside the show, and passed out flyers challenging the statement made at the "Murdered by Mumia" website that he "was unanimously convicted of the crime by a racially mixed jury based on: the testimony of several eyewitnesses, his ownership of the murder weapon, matching ballistics, and Abu-Jamal's own confession."

Murdered by Mumia: A Police Widow's Fight For Justice?

The title used for the show, "Murdered by Mumia: A Police Widow's Fight For Justice," certainly could have been better, since it does serve to equate "justice" with executing Mumia, because that is Faulkner's stated goal. However, after getting past this problematic title, it became clear that this would not be the typical biased mainstream media report on this controversial and emotionally charged case, as we have seen with past shows like ABC's 20/20.

Co-host Matt Lauer introduced the show by reporting that "On December 9th, 1981 a Philadelphia police officer was shot and killed while serving in the line of duty. A man named Mumia Abu-Jamal was convicted of the murder and sentenced to death. To this day he maintains his innocence. To some he is a cold-blooded killer, to others he's a political prisoner."

After Lauer's short introduction, the set-up piece begins with video and narration by NBC's Rehema Ellis. While showing video footage of Mumia and numerous demonstrations supporting him, the narrator states that "there have been rallies and fundraisers for a man, many say was framed by a racist legal system." While displaying the new photos, the narrator reports, "now supporters say there is new photographic evidence that should lead to a new trial," followed directly with a quote from attorney Robert R. Bryan, that "the jury only saw one side of the coin."

As the report progressed, it became clear that this was not the typical report from the mainstream media, as expressed in several ways:

1. NBC honestly reported how Abu-Jamal remains in his death-row cell despite the 2001 federal court decision overturning the death penalty.

2. The recognition that "to this day he maintains his innocence" was atypical. Often coverage repeats as fact, the false claim that Mumia has never proclaimed his innocence.

3. The footage of various demonstrations and supporters for Mumia was fairly extensive, and not presented in a demeaning way (as is usually done with labels like "Hollywood Chic," which serve to trivialize supporters as ignorant or naive dupes. They recognize that Mumia does have strong support around the word, and there is footage of Pam Africa, coordinator of Mumia's international support network (ICFFMAJ), speaking at a demonstration: "It's a righteous cause. That's why you see people here from , , , and ."

After the interview with Faulkner and Smerconish begins, footage is shown of the large demonstration in support of Mumia, while Lauer says: "I want to show people a live shot outside our studio right now and show them that there is a fairly substantial protest right across the street from our studio. These people got up early in the morning, came from someplace to express their views that this man is innocent. Why do you think they're here if they don't truly believe that?"

Faulkner answers: "They are trying the case in the court of public opinion, and not in the court of law. That is why I think people need to read the book. It's all there. My life, the facts, [and] what happened the night my husband was murdered. It's all in the book."

Lauer then cites attorney Robert R, Bryan, as saying that "when the decision came down in 1982, there were constitutional issues, racism, injustice, and evidence tampering," then further quoting Bryan as saying that Smerconish is an opportunist.

In response, Smerconish cites the fact that he is not making any money from the book, but Lauer interrupts him, saying "maybe he's not talking about financial gain," but rather about "status and attention." After Lauer asks this, they show a close up of Maureen Faulkner where she appears to be glaring at Lauer.

The Crime Scene Photos

At this point, Matt Lauer brings up the new evidence: "There are some photographs that have been released by supporters of Mumia, and they were taken by a freelancer named Pedro Polakoff. The supporters say that these photos show a policeman holding two guns in his bare hand, contradicting the officer's trial testimony that he had preserved ballistics evidence. Another shows you husband's hat on top of a car, and not on the sidewalk as it is in the official police photo of the crime scene. A third shows a blood-stained sidewalk where the shooting took place, but does not show any signs of the marks in the concrete that might have occurred if your husband had been shot from above as prosecutors contended. The defense attorney says that he can 'have a field day' with these photographs if a new trial..."

Cutting off Lauer, Smerconish makes no attempts to challenge any of these stated facts. He says "This is the outrage. For 26 years, these canards have enabled the manipulation of the process. It’s as reliable as the fact that Christmas is on the 25th of December, that they will come up with something every year. One year it was a guy who stood up and said, 'I know who murdered Danny Faulkner--I did it,' and the defense lawyers thought he was preposterous. Another year, there was a guy who said he was there and that the dying words of Danny Faulkner were "get Maureen, get the children," when everyone agrees that he died instantly, and unfortunately she never had the chance to have children with Danny. Where does it stop?"

Maureen asks "where have these pictures been for 26 years? I mean, where have they been? Why hasn't this man come forth sooner than now."

Lauer then asks his final question: "Maureen, when you're alone with your thoughts at night, when you even see pictures of the protests like the one we have across the street, does it ever cross your mind that perhaps they're right? Do you ever allow yourself to consider the fact that perhaps he didn't do it?"

Faulkner's response? "No. He murdered my husband in cold blood and there is no doubt in my mind. Absolutely no doubt."

Where Have These Pictures Been For 26 Years?

Smerconish did not try and challenge anything factually about the photos, but rather shifted the topic to two completely unrelated witnesses. In contrast, Faulkner addressed them directly by asking why it took 26 years for the photos to emerge publicly.

I asked German author Michael Schiffmann (who discovered them in 2006) to respond to this statement from Faulkner. Dr. Schiffmann says: "Indeed she has a point here. The reason it took so long is that the DA didn't want these photos, indeed didn't want to have anything to do with them and actually deep-sixed them. We can ask, why? Their authenticity is not in question as several of them appeared in the papers at the time. They didn't want them on account of what they might show, and investigation that was incredibly sloppy and manipulative. Their lack of interest - and the fact that they didn't inform the defense - alone might be reason for a new trial, as correctly pointed out by Linn Washington at the Dec. 4 press conference in Philadelphia ."

This issue of the delay, was one of the central discussions at the Dec. 4 Journalists for Mumia press conference in Philadelphia . Reuters journalist John Huddle strongly and continually challenged the panelists about this delay. As you can hear in the audio from the press conference ("Parts 1 and 2) veteran journalists Dave Lindorff and Linn Washington both firmly held their ground concerning the legitimacy of this story.

Huddle was apparently convinced that this is serious evidence that deserves media attention, because later that day he wrote an article for Reuters that accurately presented our stance regarding the new photo evidence and our demand for a new trial (read article).

Where Do We Go From Here?

This important show, and its recognition of the new crime scene photos must now be used to go even further. The new mainstream credibility of the photos can be utilized to kick start more media coverage and a longer, more in-depth mainstream media investigation into Polakoff's photos. Because these photos are such powerful evidence, it can only help us if the mainstream media puts these photos under intense scrutiny. Please help by contacting the mainstream media and asking them to investigate these photos further--giving them the public spotlight they deserve.

For more information about the crime scene photos, see the May 18, 2007 press release by Journalists for Mumia and the October, 2007 press release written by Princeton University Professor Mark L. Taylor of Educators for Mumia.

A full transcript of the Today Show's "Murdered by Mumia: A Police Widow's Fight For Justice" is available with an article by Geoffrey Dickens who writes critically about the show from the anti-Mumia perspective.

 --Hans Bennett is co-founder (with Michael Schiffmann) of Journalists for Mumia Abu-Jamal, whose website is Abu-Jamal-News.com.